Nine other states disenfranchise felons for various lengths of time following the completion of their probation or parole.However, the severity of each state's disenfranchisement varies. Template: Believe it could happen, whether it is or is not specific to the outcomenov.2017 In Reynolds v.It has been pointed out that, although lawmakers assert that felon jury exclusion measures protect the integrity of the adjudicative process, as felons “lack the requisite probity” to serve on a jury and are “inherently biased,” many of the states subscribing to this practice allow felons to practice law.).It is a class C felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison under this subsection "to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce." This has been litigated before the Supreme Court. However, Section 2 of this Amendment allows states to remove voting privileges from anyone who has participated in “rebellion or other crime.” A 1972 Supreme Court ruling found that this article applied to disenfranchisement of ex-felons.
Florida law is somewhat unusual, in that the individual must be pardoned by the Governor and a majority of the publicly elected State Cabinet (with the Governor's vote being the tiebreaker, if necessary).
When a person is convicted of an offence in which the person used a weapon, or threatened to use a weapon, the sentencing court has the power to prohibit the person from possessing a weapon for a certain period of time.
In the case of certain offences, the prohibition on possession is mandatory.
These restrictions are acceptable because they are a sanction aimed at the very offence committed by the individual, rather than being a general disenfranchisement.
The restrictions are aimed at healing the corrupted electoral process, which itself is a constitutional value, and therefore can be justified for limited periods.